Economic Dashboard

Notes about the State of the Union

UPDATED: 2/28/26

In its original conception, the State of the Union was an intelligence report. The president was supposed to use his perch to deliver a clean national view to Congress because its members necessarily couldn’t see the whole picture. George Washington, who was a fan of backwards-running sentences concluded the first State of the Union in that spirit: “I have directed the proper officers to lay before you, respectively, such papers and estimates as regard the affairs particularly recommended to your consideration, and necessary to convey to you that information of the state of the Union which it is my duty to afford.”

The speech is a mess now. The branch that once embraced the deference shown to it by presidents, is full of people clapping mindlessly for the president. But what if, in the spirit of the original purpose, you tried to figure out the actual State of the Union. It is not easy! Where do you start, what do you include? How broad is your measurement? You could spend a lifetime.

I should have stopped there. Instead, I took a partial look at the economic State of the Union. Below is a list of economic measurements and what they do or don’t tell us about the economy. (The Dow, for example, tells us little, productivity might not tell us what it once did, the wages picture is mixed, etc.) The picture that emerges isn’t boom or bust so much as a K‑shaped expansion: balance sheets and portfolios up top, credit cards and rent hikes at the bottom.

It’s dense, provisional, clogged in places, the order is not quite right, and it’s not made for TV attention spans (Born salesman!) Still, the speech is tonight and that was the deadline I gave myself. I hope the work is of some use. I’ll be tweaking it in the coming days and updating it.

1. Real GDP Growth: The total physical output of the country—every car built, every meal served, every hour of legal advice—adjusted to remove the “noise” of rising prices so we can compare different time periods.

• Current Figure: 1.4% (Q4 2025 Advance Estimate).

• The U.S. and the World: The U.S. is the world’s largest economy, but we don’t operate alone. U.S. growth can be affected by the rest of the world, so the global picture offers starting context: Global growth is subdued. The 21 countries in the euro area¹ —essentially “Europe’s economy”— are projected to grow only about 1¼–1½ percent in 2025–26. China’s outlook is restrained by cautious consumers (weak domestic demand) and an ongoing convalescence in its residential real estate sector.² This acts as a “gravity” that pulls down U.S. growth through reduced exports (can’t sell as many goods) and trade uncertainty (do I hire more if I won’t have more orders?).

• The Trajectory: A significant deceleration from the 4.4% growth seen in Q3 2025. Full-year real GDP growth slowed to 2.2% in 2025 from 2.8% in 2024, which was Biden’s final year in office. Tax breaks that kick in starting in 2026 might goose growth to come. The administration sure hopes so, because if growth goes up, so might wages which is what voters care about.

• The Self-Imposed Standard: The current 1.4% rate falls sharply short of the administration’s “Golden Age” targets of 3-5%. (Their boasts can be found in this footnote³)

• The Weakness Signal (1.4%): The engine is stalling. Consumer spending, which is 68-70 percent of U.S. GPD— saw growth slow to 2.4% in Q4 (down from 3.5% in Q3). People are spending less. When that keeps up, companies cut back — fewer orders, fewer shifts, fewer jobs.

• Shutdown Effect: In Q4 2025, real GDP growth was held back by declines in government spending and exports. The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) estimated that the reduction in federal labor services during the late-2025 shutdown subtracted approximately 1.0 percentage point from growth.⁴ That’s not likely to be repeated, but other contributors to weak GDP might be like ongoing trade uncertainty regarding tariffs. (Because administration officials predicted a boom despite the shutdown and tariffs, the soupy Q4 result suggests the drag was either larger than anticipated or the promised benefits from administration policy is weaker, or hasn’t yet materialized.)

• Small Business taking it in the teeth: The chaos caused by the tariffs pressured businesses with fewer than 50 employees to cut 120,000 jobs in November alone, the largest for any month since May 2020, according to the ADP National Employment Report. S&P Global Market Intelligence found at least 717 companies that filed for bankruptcy in 2025 through November, the most since 2010, the Washington Post reported. (Bloomberg)

2. S&P 500 Equal Weight Index: The Standard &Poor’s 500 Equal Weight Index is a collection of 500 companies meant to represent the overall stock market. They account for 80% of the total U.S. stock market’s value. It is a shorthand for how the market is doing overall. This flavor of that index gives each company an equal weight of approximately 0.2%.

• What it measures: An indicator of economic breadth because it captures broad large‑cap performance rather than the plain S&P 500 number which can look “good,” but mask a concentration of gains in the handful of mega‑cap tech giants (the “Magnificent Seven”⁵) which tells us how big companies like Apple and Nvidia are doing but is less useful as a metric of overall economic health.

• Current Status: Reversal of Magnificent Seven Dominance: By mid-February 2026, the Equal Weight Index has begun to significantly outperform the standard cap-weighted index year-to-date. (Think of it as: 493 > 7) According to S&P Global and YCharts data, the equal-weight version is up approximately 4.8% YTD (as of Feb 20, 2026), while the standard cap-weighted index has moved broadly sideways.

  • The Trend: From 2023 to 2025, the biggest companies — especially the Magnificent Seven — drove the market's gains by such a wide margin that the headline numbers looked much better than what most companies were actually experiencing. That gap is now closing.

  • The Domestic Driver: The outperformance is anchored by three specific sectors: Energy (up over 20% YTD), Materials (chemicals, metals, lumber, paper, cement, mining, packaging) (high-teens), and Industrials (Companies that build, move, and maintain big physical things) (low-double-digits). (Why are these companies rising? See footnote)⁶

• What this means in the actual economy: For a normal person, this means the recovery might be moving beyond the screen and onto the street. When the standard non-weighted S&P 500 is the only thing rising, wealth is concentrated in Silicon Valley and software subscriptions. When the Equal Weight Index leads, it signals that the “Physical Economy” is the primary driver: a regional bank in the Midwest is healthy enough to lend, a construction firm in the South has enough orders to hire, and a manufacturing plant in the Rust Belt is actually making more parts.

3. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (The “50,000” Marker): The DJIA is a curated list of 30 “Blue Chip”⁷ companies that leaders consider the stalwarts of American industry. Current Level: 49,625 (Closing Feb 20, 2026)

• The Signal: This signals that major investors are still betting on the U.S. — some because they see it as the safest place to ride out global uncertainty, and some because they think it's where their money will grow so that they can afford that summer place at the lake.

• The Limitation: The DOW does not necessarily reflect national prosperity, and frankly can be used to mask the health of the broader economy by politicians who want a quick and easy way to fool you (or distract from troubling questions). Companies may be maintaining stock prices through accounting moves or because it fired 10,000 people. The cost savings flow straight to the bottom line, Wall Street applauds, the stock rises, and the Dow ticks⁸ up. That’s not a signal of national prosperity as we’ve come to think of it in fair-minded political discussions. That’s a number going up because people lost their jobs.

• The Dow is more like good skin than cardiovascular health. It’s highly visible, moves with news, and tells you something real about market mood and the fortunes of a few emblematic firms. But it’s narrow (30 stocks), quirky (price‑weighted⁹), and can look great even when large parts of the economy are struggling.

4. Real Median Household Income: The middle‑of‑the‑pack paycheck for an American worker or household, adjusted for inflation. This is the single best measure of whether economic growth is actually reaching regular people, because unlike averages, it can’t be pulled upward by a few people making millions. The gold standard here — Census Bureau real median household income — runs on a long delay; we won’t see the 2025 number until September. BLS will release Q1 2026 real median weekly earnings on April 16. Until then, the best real-time proxy is BLS real average weekly earnings, which we’ll use with an important caveat.

• Current real pay gain: From January 2025 to January 2026, real average weekly earnings rose about 1.9%, as slightly higher real hourly pay combined with a longer workweek. That sounds decent — but remember, this is an average, which means it's vulnerable to exactly the distortion we described above. (Caveat about whether this is a broad improvement— the so-called “K shaped economy” in the footnote.)¹⁰

• Inflation: While the general inflation rate has cooled to 2.4%—which looks good on a government press release—that number is an average. It is being pulled down by falling prices in “virtual” sectors like electronics and software. The Federal Reserve believes a different gauge is more accurate: the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index.¹¹ It was running closer to 2.8–2.9 percent year‑over‑year in late 2025, with core PCE still above 2 percent and not convincingly drifting lower. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Meanwhile, the prices for the things you cannot skip—Housing, Healthcare, and Education—are rising significantly faster than your 1.9% raise, so to think through what the American household is going through, we need to think about the psychologically weighted purchases.

• The Big Three Breakdown:

  • Housing: According to Cotality, advertised rents rose approximately 5.2% over 2025, building on the large jumps seen earlier in the decade. And even as advertised rents cool a bit, mortgage rates only just slipped back below 6 percent for the first time since 2022, leaving buying well out of reach for many would‑be owners.” As reported by Starts at 60, these persistent increases come as housing shortages deepen. Because housing typically consumes 30–40% of a median household’s budget—the federal threshold for being “cost burdened”¹²—even small year-to-year rent increases can absorb a disproportionate share of a family’s income.

  • Healthcare: According to the 2025 Milliman Medical Index, the total annual cost of healthcare for a typical family of four with employer-sponsored coverage has reached $35,119. This represents a 6.7% increase in just one year and means costs have nearly tripled since 2005.

    • The Context: Over a similar period, the Census Bureau reports that real median household income has remained essentially flat—measured at $83,730 in 2024, a level not significantly different from 2019. Stressful!

    • The Squeeze: Healthcare now consumes over 40% of a typical family’s total income, compared to closer to one-fifth two decades ago. As noted in the Milliman 20th anniversary release, healthcare costs have increased by an average of 6.1% annually since 2005, far outstripping the 1.9% wage growth families are currently seeing. Meanwhile, CBO projects that healthcare changes in the OBBBA¹³ — including the expiration of enhanced ACA tax credits — will cause approximately 5 million people to lose health insurance in 2026.

    • Education: For the 2025–26 academic year, average published tuition and fees rose by 2.9% at public four-year colleges and 4.0% at private nonprofit institutions, according to the College Board’s Trends in College Pricing 2025. These increases either match or outpace the general inflation rate.

  • How do People feel? The Washington Post poll released 2/27 finds:

    • “Health care, new cars and new homes feel unaffordable to most Americans… [who] say that they can afford basic necessities like their current housing costs, groceries, utilities and gasoline. But large numbers across income levels also say larger expenses and the cost of things associated with an enjoyable life — including taking a weeklong vacation — are out of reach. Overall, 53 percent of adults say they have just enough money to maintain their standard of living, nearly identical to a year ago, while roughly half, or more, say that discretionary spending on going out to dinner, vacations and new cars is unaffordable.”

4.5 The Pipeline: What Businesses Are Paying Now That You’ll Be Paying Soon.

On February 27, the stock market dropped sharply after a hotter‑than‑expected wholesale inflation report. That’s the prices businesses pay each other — for steel, for chemicals, for shipping containers full of clothes — are going up faster than anyone expected, not slower. That matters to you because businesses don’t eat those costs. They pass them on. When it costs Target more to stock the shelves, it eventually costs you more to fill your cart.

In January, the Producer Price Index (PPI)— the government’s measure of what businesses pay each other — rose 0.5% in a single month, nearly double the 0.3% rise economists were expecting. Strip out food and energy¹⁴, which bounce aroudn a lot, and it looks worse: that “core” number jumped 0.8% versus a 0.3% forecast, pushing the year‑over‑year core rate to about 3.6%, its highest level in roughly ten months.

Those prices aren’t slowing down. Wholesale prices are re‑accelerating instead of gliding gently back toward the Federal Reserve’s comfort zone. The biggest jumps were sharp price increases in services and trade margins—the markups wholesalers and retailers charge—with especially big moves in categories you’d actually notice: like clothing and shoes, chemicals, telecom services, health and beauty products, and some food and alcohol, as companies begin passing more of their tariff and cost increases along the supply chain.

That catches my eye. Here’s why:

Since President Trump instituted his sweeping import taxes, there’s been a prediction: prices will go up. And they have — the average family is paying more. But they haven’t gone up as much as experts expected, and there’s a specific reason. Businesses saw the tariffs coming and stockpiled inventory in advance, shipping out what they’d already bought at the old prices. That bought time. But warehouses empty. The expectation was that once businesses burned through their pre-tariff stock, they’d start passing the real cost increases along — and that the turn would come early in the new year. That’s what this number suggests is happening.

Wall Street didn’t treat this as a one-month blip. Investors read it as the turn — the moment the warehouse runs dry and the real costs start showing up on price tags. That’s why the market sold off: not one bad number, but what one bad number says about the next six months.

5. The Misery Index: The Misery Index—the unemployment rate plus the inflation rate— is a quick-and-dirty (and possibly misleading!) measure of how much economic pain people are feeling..¹⁵

• Current Score: As of early 2026, the index sits at approximately 6.7, combining a 4.3% unemployment rate with 2.4% inflation.

• A score of 6 or lower is good. Workers can easily move jobs and prices aren’t eroding paychecks too quickly.

  • Pardon me for an interlude: “Prices aren’t eroding paychecks too quickly.” This kind of jargon makes me want to nap. I fall into it. I am sorry that I do. It should be “Paychecks can cover the goods people need because prices haven’t increased too quickly.” (Why this is better in the footnote.¹⁶ )

• A Misery Index between 8 and 10, things start to pinch — jobs get harder to find, or prices start outrunning wages, or both. Above 10, people are angry. (It hit 20 under Carter in 1980. Reagan used it to end his presidency.)

• At 6.7, we are slightly above that ideal: At 6.7, things are okay but not great. Prices have calmed down from the worst of it, but now the worry is shifting — fewer people are panicking about what things cost and more people are wondering whether they'll still have a job six months from now.

• Why is this Index Misleading? This measure doesn't know that your rent went up 12% or that your grocery bill feels nothing like 2.4% inflation. It's a blunt instrument. Useful for spotting big trouble, not for describing your life.

• Caveat: Economists like Michael Strain at AEI argue that the raw index may overstate the “misery” in the current labor market because the way we measure the labor force needs to change. He notes that a 4.3% jobless rate is still historically low and that layoffs remain subdued. In this view, much of the slowdown in payroll growth reflects a sharp drop in net migration rather than collapsing labor demand. For Strain, the bigger risk for 2026 is inflation re‑accelerating rather than a spike in joblessness—a nuance that the simple sum of the Misery Index can’t fully capture.

6. Labor Productivity (Nonfarm Business Sector): The amount of goods and services produced for every hour worked. If it’s high, you are likely to get a raise because you’re genuinely creating more value, and the cost of your groceries stays flat because the store is more efficient. If productivity is low, businesses have to raise prices to pay for your raise. (Or you don’t get one.)

The “Golden Era” Standard: Donald Trump talks about America being in a “Golden Era,” but in the actual Golden Era the post-war boom (1947–1969), nonfarm business productivity averaged 2.8% to 3.0%, with frequent peaks above 4.5%. This is partially what allowed a single-earner household to buy a home and a car while prices stayed flat. To deliver the “Golden Era” that the administration promises, productivity needs to sustain 3.0%+ for several consecutive quarters.

Current Picture: Two stories:

• The Quarterly Rate (Q3 2025): 4.9%. This is a single quarter, annualized. It is the strongest reading since Q3 2023.

• The Year-Over-Year Rate (Q3 2025): 1.9%. This smooths out the quarterly volatility and gives a more honest picture of the underlying trend. It’s better than the stagnant 2010s (when productivity mumbled into its cup at near 1%), but well short of the 3%+ “Golden Era” threshold.

• The Long-Term Baseline: 2.1%. This is the average annual nonfarm productivity growth rate since 1947. The current year-over-year figure is running below this historical norm. To call that a Golden Era is like naming an award after yourself.

• Q4 2025: Pending. The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the Q4 preliminary estimate on March 5, 2026. If it holds near Q3’s strength, the administration has a real talking point which is that an economic condition that can lead to broad prosperity looks like it exists. If productivity drops sharply — as GDP’s deceleration to 1.4% would suggest — the Q3 figure starts to look like a spike, not a trend.

The Accountability Lens: Watch for which number officials cite. If they quote the 4.9% quarterly figure without context, they are choosing the most flattering frame available. The year-over-year rate is the more honest measure for evaluating whether policy is producing durable change. The March 5 release will be the first real test of whether Q3 was a breakout or a blip.

The Broken Transmission: The “magic trick” often ascribed to productivity (everybody wins! operated reliably from 1947 to the early 1970s — productivity went up, wages went up with it, and prices stayed manageable. Since approximately 1973, that link has weakened dramatically. Productivity has grown, but the gains have increasingly flowed to shareholders and executives rather than to the median worker’s paycheck. ¹⁷ This means productivity is a necessary condition for broad-based prosperity — without it, the math doesn’t work at all — but it is no longer a sufficient one. The question isn’t just “is productivity growing?” but “who captures the gains?” A 3% productivity boom that flows entirely into stock buybacks and C-suite compensation would hit the “Golden Era” target on paper, increase your campaign donations, allow for blind-eye turning to obvious breaches of public norms, while leaving the median household exactly where it was. One way to accommodate this is to track productivity alongside real median wage growth and treat a widening gap between the two as a warning signal.

7. Prime-Age Labor Force Participation (Ages 25–54): The percentage of people in the “prime” of their lives who are either working or looking for work. It ignores students and retirees to focus on the “heavy lifters” of the economy.

Current Level: 84.1%. Historically high. (A historically high “Magnetic Pull” signal).

The “Desperation” Pull (I must work.) When “The Big Three” costs (Housing, Health, Education) explode, households that used to survive on one paycheck suddenly need two. People who wanted to be stay-at-home parents or full-time caregivers are forced back into the cubicle just to break even.

The “Demand” Pull (Get me to the widget maker on time): This is the healthier version. It means new factories are opening, companies are desperate for human beings to run their AI-integrated systems, and they are offering enough money and flexibility to make work more attractive than the “sidelines.”

The “Golden Era” Test: In a true Golden Era of the kind the president promises this number stays high because opportunity is everywhere. If it stays high while Real Wages are only growing at 1.9%, it suggests the desperation story is winning—people aren’t working because they want the new widgets; they’re working because they can’t afford the rent on the house where the widgets are kept.

So: At 84.1%, the “magnet” of productive work is clearly operating, but we need to check the Quit Rate (Item #8) to see if these people feel like they have any power once they get in the company email system and learn where the break room is. If participation is record-high but people are too scared to quit their jobs, it means the “sidelines” aren’t an option anymore— people have to work to stay afloat.

8. The Quit Rate: The percentage of the total workforce that voluntarily walked away from their job this month. Current Level: 2.0% (Approx. 3.2 million people).

What this means in the real world:

• The “Golden Era” for Workers (3.0%): This was the Great Resignation peak. In this world, employees had the ball. They could tell a bad boss to shove it because there were three other jobs down the street paying $2 more an hour. (And they could mix their metaphors between playing ball and shoving it, and no one said boo.)

• The “Stagnation” Signal (1.5% or lower): This is a bummer. You stay in a job you hate, with a supervisor who disrespects you, because you’re terrified that if you leave, you won’t find anything else.

• The Current Status (2.0%): We are in a “Slow-Motion” economy. The 2.0% rate is exactly the long-term historical average, but it’s a significant drop from the 3% which gave workers power two years ago. ¹⁸ We are in a 'Slow-Motion' economy. The 2.0% rate is the long-term average, but it's a sharp drop from the 3% that gave workers real power. The result is what analysts at Indeed Hiring Lab call a game of musical chairs where the music has stopped — everyone's staying put, which means fewer open seats for you, and less reason for your boss to pay more to keep you from leaving. (That’s why your 1.9% wage growth has stalled.)

9. Consumer Debt: The total amount American households owe on credit cards, auto loans, and other non-mortgage debt. It’s the metric that reveals how people are actually funding their lives when wages (Item 4) don’t cover the “Big Three.”

Current Picture: $1.28 Trillion (Q4 2025): This is the highest level ever tracked by the New York Fed.🚨It has surged 66% from the pandemic lows of 2021.

• The Cost: The average interest rate on accounts carrying a balance is now 22.3%. At that rate, a household carrying the average balance of $6,500 pays roughly $1,400 a year in interest alone — money that buys nothing, reduces the balance barely at all, and disappears from the real economy entirely.

• The Usage: Roughly 46% of cardholders now carry a month-to-month balance. Crucially, a growing share (33%) according to Bankrate’s 2026 Credit Card Debt Report cite “day-to-day expenses” like groceries and utilities—not luxuries—as the primary reason for the debt.

• What this means in the actual economy: This is the hidden unhealthy engine behind the consumer spending that still shows up in GDP. (Which should make you skeptical of anyone who cites GDP alone as the only thing they need to say about the health of the economy.) We think when real GDP goes up, that number represents prosperity, but if it’s from borrowing then it’s a danger. Each dollar of credit card debt at current rates costs roughly 22 cents a year just to service. That’s money that can’t go to restaurants, savings, or the “discretionary” spending that feeds the engine of growth. The headline growth number in a high consumer debt world is borrowing from the future to flatter the present.

• The Warning Signal: * Aggregate Delinquency: As of Q4 2025, 4.8% of all outstanding household debt ($18.8 trillion) was in some stage of delinquency. This is a 0.3 percentage point increase from the previous quarter, driven primarily by rising stress in mortgages and student loans.

  • The Credit Card Crisis: If you look only at credit cards, the situation is far more severe. The transition rate into serious delinquency (90+ days overdue) for credit cards stood at 7.13% in Q4 2025.

  • The Lower-Income Squeeze: In the lowest-income ZIP codes, serious delinquency rates for credit cards have pushed above 20%. This is the highest level of concentrated financial distress seen in decades.

  • The K-Shaped Squeeze: Younger and lower-income borrowers are falling behind at significantly higher rates. This is where the dashboard’s “split-screen” is most vivid: the same economy that looks healthy in a 50,000 Dow is pushing a specific segment of households toward a financial breaking point. (If your favorite politician has talked about themselves as a champion of the forgotten Americans and they don’t talk about this, you have a disconnect.)

The Connection: If the Quit Rate (Item 8) shows people are staying in “meh” jobs out of fear, and The Big Three (Item 4) show their costs are outrunning their pay, then Consumer Debt is how they are making up the difference. It is a bridge between stagnant reality and continued spending—but at 22% interest, it’s a bridge that charges a massive toll. When the administration says the “economy is great,” they are looking at the traffic crossing the bridge; the households and humans who live in them are looking at (or experiencing) the structural cracks and the cost of the crossing.

10. The Federal Deficit and Fiscal Trajectory: Every year, the federal government spends more than it collects in taxes. The difference is the deficit. To cover it, the government borrows money by selling Treasury bonds — essentially IOUs — to investors around the world. The national debt is the pile of IOUs that has accumulated over decades of deficits.

Why you should care: The government borrows money in the same marketplace where businesses borrow to build factories and where you borrow to buy a house. When the government needs $7 billion a day — which it currently does — it is competing with every other borrower for the available pool of money. The more the government borrows, the more it drives up the price of borrowing for everyone else. That price is the interest rate. So when your mortgage rate is 6% instead of 4%, part of the reason is that the U.S. government got to the lending window ahead of you and took a very large share of what was available. The deficit isn’t an abstraction that lives in Washington. It lives in your monthly housing payment.

There’s a second cost. The government has to pay interest on all those accumulated IOUs. In FY 2025, that interest bill crossed $1 trillion for the first time — more than the entire defense budget. Every dollar that goes to interest is a dollar that cannot go to roads, schools, veterans’ care, or tax relief. The debt doesn’t just crowd out your borrowing; it crowds out your government’s ability to do things for which we constitute a government.

Current Picture: The FY 2025 deficit was $1.8 trillion. Federal debt held by the public (all those IOUs) has reached 99.8% of GDP. The government now owes roughly as much as the entire country produces in a year.¹⁹ CBO projects cumulative deficits of $26 trillion over the next decade. There is no plan, from either party, that credibly reverses this.

The Connection to Your Life: The government is just like you! In Item 9, we discussed that American households are borrowing on credit cards at 22% to cover the gap between their paychecks and their bills. The federal government is doing the same thing — borrowing to cover the gap between its revenue and its spending. The difference is that when a household maxes out its credit cards, it goes bankrupt. When the government does it, it doesn’t go bankrupt — it makes your borrowing more expensive (Congratulations!), it makes your government less capable, and it passes the bill to your children in the form of higher taxes, reduced services, or both.

The Accountability Lens: The current administration has two competing fiscal stories, and they cannot both be true simultaneously.

First, the DOGE Story: The Department of Government Efficiency claims roughly $150 billion in savings through contract terminations, lease cancellations, and workforce reductions. Independent analyses — from NPR, AEI, and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget — have found these figures consistently overstated, with actual verified savings likely closer to $10-55 billion, depending on the methodology and time horizon. Even taking DOGE’s own numbers at face value, they represent roughly four cents of savings for every dollar the government spent in the first four months of FY 2026.

Second, The Legislative Story: Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act: The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) will add $4.1 trillion to federal deficits over the next decade (2025–2034). That’s going in the wrong direction, but wait, there’s more. The bill is likely to cost even more than projected because it is designed with mechanisms that will be politically unpopular when they hit and which a future Congress will “fix.” This will increase the fiscal problem further. (What do I mean? Footnote!)²⁰

The Growth Bet: The White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) justifies this cost by declaring that a combination of deregulation, tariff revenue, and tax incentives will spark an economic boom, driving 4% annual Real GDP growth through 2028. The CEA argues the bill actually pays for itself and eventually reduces the debt-to-GDP ratio.

• Most non-partisan forecasters remain skeptical of the 4% target. The CBO projects a more modest growth rate of 2.2% in 2026, falling to 1.8% in 2027 and 2028 as benefit of the tax cuts wears off. The Federal Reserve is even more conservative, projecting growth will stabilize around 2.0% in 2027 and 1.9% in 2028.

The Arithmetic: You cannot cut $150 billion (at the most generous estimate) while adding $4.1 trillion and call the result fiscal discipline.

The deficit connects to nearly everything else here. Government borrowing affects interest rates (Item 11), which affect mortgage costs (Item 4’s Big Three), which affect consumer debt (Item 9), which affects the spending that drives GDP (Item 1). A country borrowing $7 billion a day to sustain its current operations is a country whose “Engine” is partially running on credit — the same problem households face in Item 9, just at a national scale.

11. The Interest Rate Environment: This isn’t a single number but a chain of linked rates that together determine the cost of borrowing money in America — for the government, for businesses, and for you. When rates are low, money is cheap: businesses borrow to build, consumers borrow to buy homes and cars, and economic activity accelerates — but prices can accelerate too. When rates are high, money is expensive: borrowing slows, spending cools, and inflation comes down — but so do hiring, investment, and growth. The entire art of monetary policy is trying to find the setting where the economy grows without overheating. Right now, the Fed isn’t sure it’s found it.

The Key Rates (as of February 20, 2026):

• We mostly hear about the Federal Funds Rate, which is currently at 3.5%–3.75%. This is what banks charge each other for overnight loans, set by the Federal Reserve, that in turn affects what banks can lend to consumers (auto loans, HELOCs) and small businesses (inventory lines of credit). If the rate is too high, it costs too much for a local shop to finance new equipment; GDP and wages stay low. If rates are low, activity increases, but if they drop too fast, inflation can re-ignite, eating up any wage gains.

• The 10-Year Treasury Yield: 4.08%. is what it costs the U.S. government to borrow money for a decade, and it’s the benchmark that most directly affects your mortgage rate. It has come down modestly from its late-2025 highs. But if purchasers think that Donald Trump is pressuring the Fed into making political and not economic decisions, they will demand a higher premium to lend to the United States, which would push long-term rates up regardless of what the Fed does to short-term rates.

• 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rate: 6.01%. Freddie Mac now has the 30‑year fixed at 5.98 percent, the first sub‑6 reading since September 2022, down from 6.85% a year ago. This is the rate that connects directly to the Housing line in your Big Three (Item 4). While 6% is better than 7%, it is still double the pandemic-era lows, keeping many would-be buyers locked out.

• Average Credit Card APR: 22.3%. It has barely budged despite the Fed’s three rate cuts. Credit card issuers are notoriously slow to pass savings to you, and with rising delinquencies, they have a built-in excuse to keep rates high.

The Accountability Lens: The administration’s plan to add $4.1 trillion in debt relies on interest rates staying low enough to make that debt “affordable.” If the Fed is forced to keep rates at 3.75% to fight the inflation caused by tariffs—or if the 10-Year Yield spikes because investors lose trust in the Fed’s independence—the interest on our national debt will become the largest single item in the budget.

12. Consumer Sentiment: The Perception Gap: The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index surveys Americans monthly on how they feel about their personal finances and the economy. In a country where 70% of GDP comes from household spending, these feelings are a leading indicator of whether the “Engine” (Item 1) stays running or stalls.

• Current Level: 56.6 (February 2026, final). This is effectively a “Recession Signal.” A score of 56.6 sits in the 3rd percentile of the index’s nearly 50-year history. It is lower than the sentiment at the start of all six U.S. recessions since 1978 and is 33% below its long-term average of 84.

• What the data suggests: * The Inflation Lag: While general inflation has cooled to 2.4%, 46% of consumers spontaneously mentioned that high prices are eroding their personal finances—a share that has exceeded 40% for seven consecutive months. They may be feeling the Big Three, regardless of what the CPI is.²¹ Also, Consumers aren’t reacting to the rate of inflation; they are reacting to the price level. Your grocery bill didn’t come back down — it just stopped climbing as fast.

• The K-Shaped Divergence: The February survey revealed a stark divide. Sentiment among households with large stock portfolios (the top third) rose to 68.3, while sentiment among non-stockholders declined to 46.7.

  • The Gap: This 21.6-point gap is historically large. It mirrors the “K-shaped” distress in the Consumer Debt data (Item 9): wealth is concentrated at the top, while the bottom half—the people whose “living standards are being eroded”—report an outlook that matches the darkest months of the 1980s and 2008.

The Accountability Lens: The “Perception Gap” is the administration’s biggest hurdle. If they point to the Dow 50,000 (Item 3) as proof of a “Golden Era,” they are speaking only to the minority of Americans whose sentiment is actually rising.

For the non-stockholder—whose sentiment is in the “basement” at 46.7—the economy isn’t booming; it’s a daily worry about the Big Three (Item 4). Until those prices come down or wages grow fast enough to bridge the 21.6-point gap, the “Golden Era” will remain a marketing claim that feels like an insult to a huge portion of the electorate.

1. The “euro area” (often called the eurozone) is the group of European Union countries that have adopted the euro as their official currency and share a common monetary policy under the European Central Bank (The ECB!) As of early 2026, the euro area consists of 21 of the 27 EU member states: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain.

2. Massive property developers like Evergrande built way too much, borrowed way too much, and then couldn't pay their debts. Housing prices fell, construction slowed, and because real estate was such a huge part of China's economy — something like a quarter to a third of GDP — the whole thing is still dragging on growth years later.

• Scott Bessent (Treasury): Recently projected 3% Real GDP growth as a baseline.

• Speaking from Davos on January 21, 2026, Lutnick told Fox Business, “This quarter—the first quarter of 2026—the United States of America’s $30 trillion economy will exceed 5% growth.”

• In December 2025, Hassett told Fox Business: “3% [growth] would disappoint me. It could easily be a full percentage point higher [4%].”

• During his 2024 campaign and into early 2025, Trump repeatedly promised that his mix of tariffs and tax cuts would spark an “economic boom the likes of which we’ve never seen,” often citing 4%, 5%, or even 6% as the “natural” growth rate of a Trump-led economy.

3.

4. You might have heard President Trump say that it affected GDP by two points, but that was a verifiable lie.

5. The "Magnificent Seven" are the seven massive tech companies — Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Meta (Facebook), Nvidia, and Tesla — that have driven most of the stock market's gains in recent years. They're so valuable that their combined performance can make the whole S&P 500 look healthy even when the other 493 companies are treading water.

6. Footnote: Competing Explanations for the Great Sector Rotation

1. The Policy Incentive Story (Administration’s Preferred Narrative). The market is responding to “build, baby, build” rhetoric and incentives for domestic factory construction. Under this reading, capital is flowing into physical assets because investors believe the government is creating durable, profitable conditions for industrial expansion.

2. The Tariff Reshoring Story. Capital is flowing into domestic industrials not because building here is newly attractive, but because tariffs make importing from abroad is newly risky or expensive. Distinction from #1: Incentive-driven building is a country choosing to invest in itself. Tariff-driven reshoring is a country being forced to replace cheaper foreign production with more expensive domestic production. The first is expansionary. The second can be inflationary.

3. Energy Price: Oil and gas equities are up sharply, which alone can pull the Energy sector high enough to move the equal-weight index. If the rotation is primarily energy-driven — because of supply disruptions, geopolitical risk premiums, or expanded drilling permits — then it tells you less about broad industrial health and more about one commodity cycle.

4. The Mean-Reversion Story. 4. For roughly two years, an enormous share of investor money piled into a handful of tech giants, leaving the other 490-odd companies in the S&P relatively starved for attention. That concentration was historically unusual — it couldn’t last forever. Some of what we’re seeing now may simply be money spreading back out to where it would normally be. If that’s the main driver, the rotation is real, but it’s less a sign of new industrial strength than it is the market correcting its own previous lopsidedness.

The honest answer is that all four are probably operating simultaneously, in unknown proportions. The dashboard should track which story the data increasingly supports over time, rather than locking in an explanation prematurely.

7. It comes from poker. Blue chips were the highest-denomination chips at the table. Sometime in the 1920s, a Dow Jones employee named Oliver Gingold reportedly borrowed the term to describe high-priced, high-quality stocks, and it stuck. Now it just means big, established, financially stable companies with long track records — the ones your grandfather would have told you were “safe” to invest in.

8. In financial writing, indices like the Dow and inflation are always “ticking” up and “ticking” down. I hate this cliché, and yet here I am imprisoned in it.

9. Price-weighted, meaning stocks with higher share prices have more influence regardless of the company's actual size — a quirk that can distort the picture.

10. Wage gains are not the same for all. According to the Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker, the gold standard for non-partisan wage data, there was a widening “spread” between the highest and lowest earners. Nominal wage growth for the 1st (highest) Quartile remained resilient at roughly 4.2%. Wage growth for the 4th (lowest) Quartile slowed more significantly than any other group in 2025. When adjusted for the “Personal Consumption Expenditures” (PCE) price index—the Fed’s preferred inflation metric—this group’s real purchasing power stagnated, while the top quartile’s purchasing power grew.

11. PCE covers a broader set of goods and services than CPI, including things bought on households’ behalf (like employer‑paid health insurance), so it better captures total consumption. Its weights update more flexibly, allowing for substitution when people change what they buy as relative prices move (switching from beef to chicken, for example), whereas CPI is built on a more fixed “basket” of items that it evaluates. This seeks to make PCE less prone to overstate inflation when consumers are actively trading down, and its historical series can be revised in a consistent way, which policymakers like for studying trends. Over time PCE tends to run a few tenths below CPI (partly because it gives less weight to shelter and more to healthcare), so the Fed explicitly defined its 2 percent target in terms of PCE rather than CPI.

12. “Cost burdened” is a term the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) uses. It means you’re spending more than 30% of your gross income on housing — rent or mortgage plus utilities. If you’re spending more than 50%, they call you “severely cost burdened.” Once housing or something else eats up more than roughly a third of your income, everything else starts getting squeezed — groceries, healthcare, saving for emergencies, your kid’s shoes. You’re not broke on paper, but you’re one car repair away from trouble. So maybe be nicer to that service worker, bus driver, human out in the world because they are stressed.

13. One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)

14. It excludes food and energy because those prices swing around a lot month to month, often for reasons that have little to do with the underlying inflation trend (like a cold snap hitting crops or a temporary spike in oil prices). Economists and policymakers use “core” measures to strip out that noise so they can see whether broad, slow‑moving price pressures are building across the rest of the economy.

15. This started life as economist Arthur Okun’s back‑of‑the‑envelope “discomfort index.” It was later famously brandished by Jimmy Carter against Gerald Ford and subsequently by Ronald Reagan against Carter.

• This sentence is better because “paychecks” are closer to “workers.” You want to start the clause with the thing that most directly links with the subject of the previous clause. (That is the whole engine of this project. Start with the thing closest to the person, then move outward.) Prices didn’t do that. And “eroding paychecks” It’s fancy writing without conveying anything. What we want to know is how is the information you’re telling me related to the way people live their lives? in this case, can they buy what they need? Eroding a paycheck is abstract. Being able to pay for what you need is something people understand. They all know what they need.

16.

17. The Economic Policy Institute (a left-leaning think tank) estimates that from 1979 to 2024, net productivity grew roughly 80% while median hourly compensation grew only about 30%.

• I’m not weighing in on the idea of meaning at work, which I think has changed since the pandemic. This matters politically because while the numbers might suggest people are relatively okay with working in their jobs, the increased expectation in what it means to have a job you find meaningful might make the pain of staying in a “meh” job higher and that leads to possible greater economic/political angst.

18.

19. I confess that if I were better at doing this, I would be able to land the enormity of this number. But I haven’t been able to find a way to do it yet.

• The bill is designed with costs that hit immediately (in the form of tax cuts, for example) and savings that phase in later— meaning the savings may or may not take place. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) notes that the deficit impact peaks at $635 billion in 2027—representing about 2.0% of GDP—before supposedly declining as temporary tax provisions expire and spending cuts to Medicaid and SNAP take hold. Maybe, but the temporary tax provisions create political constituencies that will fight to extend them, and the Medicaid/SNAP cuts will face legislative resistance as they start to bite real people. The tax cuts were deliberately made retroactive to 2025 and the administration deliberately delayed updating paycheck withholding formulas. The result: instead of seeing an extra $20 per paycheck throughout the year, taxpayers will receive lump-sum refunds averaging $1,000 more than last year — arriving in bank accounts ahead of the 2026 midterms. The Treasury Department projects roughly $100 billion in additional refunds this filing season. But the benefits are distributed through deductions, not credits, which means almost no one in the bottom 20% of households will see anything. Seventy percent of households get something; the bottom fifth gets essentially nothing. The costs, meanwhile, are spread across a decade.

20.

21. CPI: The Consumer Price Index, the standard measure of inflation.